[Exemplifying the current standards placed on United States
political officials, the relaxation of many ethics has come to
warp and often replace the code of conduct originally expressed

in writing to protect against corruption. Once in place, a new
code of ethics can be loopholed to then to another, and then to
another. Change is not the culprit, instead investment in

bending moral practices to suit personal and singular liberty
blures the already networked and confusing practice of law and
lawmaking. Not seeing the cycle, politicians all too often fall

prey to the "Washington" way of life. In this way, then,
traditions and attitudes are fostered in this moral enviornment.
It may be stated, with a certain amount of reassurance, that a

country which was founded on the idea of illegal (example b:1)
and unethical expansionism cannot prosper in a way that is
beneficial to the whole of humankind. One act of terror and

murder neturally leads itself to another act of retaliation. It
has been theorized that that the human animal learns by example.
We can look at this in a personal level; a father beats his wife,

the son beats his wife, and in this way a violent cycle is
founded. The truly unfortunate and important aspect of this
succession is that most people believe their actions to be not

only correct but inherently plausible and morally
justifiable.]


["lyrics were and improvised ouburst, and are subject to change,
though the ideas and meaning remain the same."]